Microsoft wireless display adapter v1 vs v2
- MICROSOFT WIRELESS DISPLAY ADAPTER V1 VS V2 UPDATE
- MICROSOFT WIRELESS DISPLAY ADAPTER V1 VS V2 WINDOWS 10
- MICROSOFT WIRELESS DISPLAY ADAPTER V1 VS V2 FOR ANDROID
MICROSOFT WIRELESS DISPLAY ADAPTER V1 VS V2 UPDATE
You might wonder how you can update the firmware on something with no obvious controls. The plastic surround of the USB plug on the extension is less than 15mm wide and 8mm thick, so it should fit into tighter environments (the USB socket on the same cable matches the size of the main USB plug).Īs delivered, the Adaptor had firmware V.
![microsoft wireless display adapter v1 vs v2 microsoft wireless display adapter v1 vs v2](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51BQbrFON-L._SX218_BO1,204,203,200_QL40_.jpg)
Stylistically, they are in keeping with Microsoft’s hardware products (the Surface Pro Dock, for example), but at perhaps 21.5mm wide and 11mm thick, they may not fit into some sockets, particularly if they’re close spaced or inset. Both the HDMI and USB plugs have fairly chunky surrounds. And then I realised that perhaps it wasn’t about length but width. It may rescue the user on occasion, but making it thirty or forty centimetres would probably mean rescuing the user in just about all circumstances. It adds a little less than 15cm to the overall length. I was puzzling over the point of the extension cable. This one has a longer body on the HDMI end and a shorter one on the USB end. I see that Microsoft still has the first version available at its store as well. The two ends can plug into a joint receptacle for neatness and protection In a nice touch, a short plastic receptacle is provided which allows the plugs to be inserted in either end, keeping things neat for travelling. The necessary electronics are packed into one or both of the casings for the plugs. It’s simply a 30cm cable with a USB plug on one end and a HDMI plug on the other. So, back to the Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter. It might be “AllShare” (which used to be the name Samsung used, but now its phones just say “Quick Connect”). Note: the name Miracast is often not used. With a standalone receiver, you just switch to the input it’s plugged into. It could equally be a spare HDMI-equipped computer monitor.Įase of use? In order to use Miracast on many smart TVs need you to navigate via the home screen to an option to switch it on. At a pinch you can use your iPhone charger for the latter. All you need on her TV is a spare HDMI input and a USB socket for power. Portability? What if you don’t have a smart TV, or you’re visiting your great Aunt who doesn’t have a smart TV. Two reasons I’d suggest: portability and ease of use. So why would you want a separate device for it? It is built into a lot of devices: many smart TVs, for example, and some smart Blu-ray players. To some extent Miracast is a wireless replacement for a HDMI cable.
![microsoft wireless display adapter v1 vs v2 microsoft wireless display adapter v1 vs v2](https://empowersmb.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft_New_Logo2.png)
Microsoft Wireless Display Adaptor HDMI plug Window 8.1 had Miracast support built in (as does Windows 10) and this time last year Intel discontinued WiDi completely. Intel added Miracast support to WiDi in 2012, presumably seeing the silliness of having competing standards. But it was tied to particular Intel network chipsets and so could be problematic.
MICROSOFT WIRELESS DISPLAY ADAPTER V1 VS V2 FOR ANDROID
Miracast was for Android (and sometimes other devices). They used WiFi Direct – the means by which to devices can connect directly to each other via WiFi, rather than through your WiFi router. Intel used to provide a WiDi app for Windows 8 (and I think it worked with Window 7 as well), but now they’ve dropped it.īoth Miracast and WiDi had a lot in common.
MICROSOFT WIRELESS DISPLAY ADAPTER V1 VS V2 WINDOWS 10
You will need Windows 8.1 or Windows 10 for your computer.